Competition is crucial for more avidly pursuing knowledge, and thus with extremely comprehensive knowledge comes a ora of power or perhaps superiority. I feel that this is how Europe is viewed in the eyes of many Americans--as a pretentious but all together intimidating force of knowledge and intellectual critique. While not untrue, it is important to note about the education system that while the grass may appear greener on the other side, it might just be because it is a different kind of grass, not necessarily better grass.
I was shocked to learn that in France, where all is intellectual, debatable, and freely accessible (funded by the state), that students either sink or swim. I suppose that this observation should not be so surprising, and it seems a little naive even as I type it, but I guess I just always thought that the french education system embodied all the good traits of US schools and was free--thus making it perfect in my mind. Au contraire, the grass is simply an altogether different species. It is really a bit of a trade off, and goes like this (university level):
US
privatized and expensive
Many options for financial aid and scholarships
smaller classes
more individual attention to each student
many/most students work to pay for school, many subsidized by parents
--distraction from school work
decisive majors later on, if not until graduate school (try many things so that you are certain of your life path and goals)
Practical experience is crucial and the best programs are judged on the resources in place to get students working in their fields before leaving school-- make connections
Through practicum, learning whether or not one likes the field of interest and what elements in particular one wants to pursue or not
Success after graduation: the view is classically american--the little train that could--anyone can succeed if they try hard enough (Land of Opportunity)
FRANCE
Funded by the state
Scholarships only awarded to the very poorest of poor (nothing for middle class students)
Large class size
Little to no individual attention to each student
most students DO NOT work while attending school and are subsidized by parents
--no distraction from school work, unless the student's family is too poor to fully support them, in which case they must work, putting them below their comrades (less time to study)
decisive majors early on: choose a field, stay with it, and become an expert (there is no other choice)
Mostly, if not solely theoretical education and experience. No connections other than professors and family/friend connections made during school
No practicum, so once entering the real world, one might realize they do not actually like the field they are in
Success after graduation: if you have been privileged enough to make it through a Grande Ecole, and not just a Université, you are among France's elite society---most minorities and students from immigrant families do not make it this far and remain at their same social niveau
All in all, for those that believe education MUST be free for all, the thought is a noble one rooted in good intentions, but FAITES ATTENTION! Not all that shimmers is gold and the grass is really just a different species. Think hard before you criticize what is in place in America and realize that nothing is perfect. The land of No Exceptions is no exception.
No comments:
Post a Comment